Soderstrom v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Soderstrom v. City of New York

3 A.D.2d 838, 160 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6004

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 838 (Soderstrom v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soderstrom v. City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 838, 160 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a fall on a crosswalk covered with ice and snow, the appeal is from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of respondent. The accident occurred on December 25, 1948, around 2:30 a. m., about five days after the termination of a snowstorm during which 16.7 inches of snow fell. Respondent claimed that the accident was caused by the negligent piling of snow by appellant at the place of the accident after the roadway had been cleared by snowplows. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed. The findings of fact are affirmed. (Davis v. City of New York, 296 N. Y. 869; Weisfeld v. City of New York, 282 App. Div. 739.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a fall on a crosswalk covered with ice and snow, the appeal is from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of respondent. The accident occurred on December 25, 1948, around 2:30 a. m., about five days after the termination of a snowstorm during which 16.7 inches of snow fell. Respondent claimed that the accident was caused by the negligent piling of snow by appellant at the place of the accident after the roadway had been cleared by snowplows. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed. The findings of fact are affirmed. (Davis v. City of New York, 296 N. Y. 869; Weisfeld v. City of New York, 282 App. Div. 739.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 838, 160 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soderstrom-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack