Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 882
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of parts of debarking machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 369, Abstract 69205), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 882 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 882 (Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 369 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)