Soderberg v. Proctor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Soderberg v. Proctor

262 A.D. 971, 30 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6708

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1941·Published

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered by the infant plaintiff, and for loss of services by his father, the adult plaintiff, because of the utterance by the defendant in the presence of the two plaintiffs and the infant’s mother of certain language reflecting on the infant, which language, however, was not slanderous per se. Judgment for the defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered by the infant plaintiff, and for loss of services by his father, the adult plaintiff, because of the utterance by the defendant in the presence of the two plaintiffs and the infant’s mother of certain language reflecting on the infant, which language, however, was not slanderous per se. Judgment for the defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Soderberg v. Proctor, 262 A.D. 971, 30 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 971 (Soderberg v. Proctor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.