Soden v. LAKES OF THE NORTH ASSOCIATION
714 N.W.2d 329, 475 Mich. 873
Opinion
Arnold SODEN, Donald Turnbull, Marion Turnbull, Sharleen Carrell, Gladys Rice, Donald Rice, A. Gagne, Barbara Binkley, Larry Binkley, Fred Brant, Judith Brant, Fred Brant, Mary Brant, Joseph Brant, Kenneth Allen, Ann Allen, Gerald Torsch, Janet Torsch, Emily Taylor, Richard Hartman, Dayne-Ann Held, James Schniers, Judi Schniers, Ralph Levely, Donna Levely, Richard Demaria, Nancy Demaria, Marlene Hinchliffe, Ted Hoinka, Elizabeth Spaltensperger and George Spaltensperger, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LAKES OF THE NORTH ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soden v. LAKES OF THE NORTH ASSOCIATION, 714 N.W.2d 329, 475 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2006).
714 N.W.2d 329 (Soden v. LAKES OF THE NORTH ASSOCIATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.