Soda Dispensing Systems, Inc. v. Soda Dispensing Systems Acquistion Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Soda Dispensing Systems, Inc. v. Soda Dispensing Systems Acquistion Corp.

260 A.D.2d 568, 686 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 568 (Soda Dispensing Systems, Inc. v. Soda Dispensing Systems Acquistion Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soda Dispensing Systems, Inc. v. Soda Dispensing Systems Acquistion Corp., 260 A.D.2d 568, 686 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, [569]*569the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Driscoll, J.), dated March 5, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment since the record presents material issues of fact requiring a trial (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, [569]*569the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Driscoll, J.), dated March 5, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment since the record presents material issues of fact requiring a trial (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 568, 686 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soda-dispensing-systems-inc-v-soda-dispensing-systems-acquistion-corp-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack