Society for Savings v. Stramaglia
598 A.2d 367, 220 Conn. 926, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 479
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 688, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the circumstances of this case, was it an abuse of discretion to deny the motion to open a judgment of strict foreclosure?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Society for Savings v. Stramaglia, 598 A.2d 367, 220 Conn. 926, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 479 (Colo. 1991).
598 A.2d 367 (Society for Savings v. Stramaglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Society for Savings v. Stramaglia
621 A.2d 1317 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)