Society for Animal Rights, Inc. v. Township of Mahwah
Opinion
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Pressler’s opinion reported at 138 N. J. Super. 322 (Law Div. 1975).
[250] We note that in the trial judge’s opinion the question of the viability of commercial contracts into which the Hudson-type municipalities have entered was reserved with leave granted to plaintiffs to move, if they so chose, with respect to any such contracts. 138 N. J. Super. at 342-343. Subsequent to Judge Pressler’s opinion plaintiffs filed a stipulation waiving any right they may have to challenge such contracts. The issue is therefore no longer in the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
372 A.2d 619 (Society for Animal Rights, Inc. v. Township of Mahwah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.