Societe Euro-Suisse, S. A. v. Citizens & Southern International Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Societe Euro-Suisse, S. A. v. Citizens & Southern International Bank

394 So. 2d 533, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19573

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1458

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 394 So. 2d 533 (Societe Euro-Suisse, S. A. v. Citizens & Southern International Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Societe Euro-Suisse, S. A. v. Citizens & Southern International Bank, 394 So. 2d 533, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final summary judgment under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings upon a holding that: (a) the final summary judgment was prematurely entered because the plaintiff [Societe Euro-Suisse, S.A.], through no fault of its own, had not completed its discovery in this case, see e. g. [534]*534Cullen v. Big Daddy’s Lounges, Inc., 364 So.2d 839 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Commercial Bank of Kendall v. Heiman, 322 So.2d 564 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); and (b) the incomplete record before the trial court did not, in any event, conclusively foreclose recovery on the plaintiff’s tort claims as pled in the second amended complaint, see e. g., Peoples Bank in North Fort Myers v. Bob Lincoln, Inc., 283 So.2d 400 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); § 673.409(2), Fla.Stat. (1972); 2 R. Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code 3-409:1 (2 ed. 1971); 5 Fla.Jur.2d “Banks” § 213 (1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final summary judgment under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings upon a holding that: (a) the final summary judgment was prematurely entered because the plaintiff [Societe Euro-Suisse, S.A.], through no fault of its own, had not completed its discovery in this case, see e. g. [534]*534Cullen v. Big Daddy’s Lounges, Inc., 364 So.2d 839 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Commercial Bank of Kendall v. Heiman, 322 So.2d 564 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); and (b) the incomplete record before the trial court did not, in any event, conclusively foreclose recovery on the plaintiff’s tort claims as pled in the second amended complaint, see e. g., Peoples Bank in North Fort Myers v. Bob Lincoln, Inc., 283 So.2d 400 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); § 673.409(2), Fla.Stat. (1972); 2 R. Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code 3-409:1 (2 ed. 1971); 5 Fla.Jur.2d “Banks” § 213 (1978).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 So. 2d 533, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/societe-euro-suisse-s-a-v-citizens-southern-international-bank-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack