Societe Des Huiles D'Olive De Nice v. Rorke

31 N.Y.S. 51, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 345, 82 Hun 611
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 N.Y.S. 51 (Societe Des Huiles D'Olive De Nice v. Rorke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Societe Des Huiles D'Olive De Nice v. Rorke, 31 N.Y.S. 51, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 345, 82 Hun 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

O’BRIEN, J.

The defendant and one Thomas N. Dwyer were partners from February, 1884, until October, 1893, in the wine and olive-oil business, under the firm name of Thomas N. Dwyer & Co. They purchased their oil in Europe, which was put up in cases, tins, and bottles bearing a certain label, concerning the right to use which this controversy arises. The plaintiff’s claim was that the oil was manufactured by one Andemard, who in 1887 transferred to the plaintiff his business and property, and that, in the sale of their oils, Dwyer & Co. acted as agents. They used the following label:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott Varnish Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
221 F. 797 (N.D. Illinois, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.Y.S. 51, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 345, 82 Hun 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/societe-des-huiles-dolive-de-nice-v-rorke-nysupct-1894.