Societe Des Huiles D'Olive De Nice v. Rorke

31 N.Y.S. 51, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 345, 82 Hun 611
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

O’BRIEN, J.

The defendant and one Thomas N. Dwyer were partners from February, 1884, until October, 1893, in the wine and olive-oil business, under the firm name of Thomas N. Dwyer & Co. They purchased their oil in Europe, which was put up in cases, tins, and bottles bearing a certain label, concerning the right to use which this controversy arises. The plaintiff’s claim was that the oil was manufactured by one Andemard, who in 1887 transferred to the plaintiff his business and property, and that, in the sale of their oils, Dwyer & Co. acted as agents. They used the following label:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Societe Des Huiles D'Olive De Nice v. Rorke, 31 N.Y.S. 51, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 345, 82 Hun 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

31 N.Y.S. 51 (Societe Des Huiles D'Olive De Nice v. Rorke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott Varnish Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
221 F. 797 (N.D. Illinois, 1915)