SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION GUINO v. Renoir

561 F.3d 969
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2009
Docket07-15582, 07-15583, 07-17209
StatusPublished

This text of 561 F.3d 969 (SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION GUINO v. Renoir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION GUINO v. Renoir, 561 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

561 F.3d 969 (2009)

SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION RICHARD GUINO, a french trust, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jean-Emmanuel RENOIR, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, and
Beseder Inc., doing business as Rima Fine Art; Dror Darel, husband; Tracy L. Penwell, wife, Defendants.
Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino, a french trust, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jean-Emmanuel Renoir, an individual, Defendant, and
Beseder Inc., doing business as Rima Fine Art; Dror Darel, husband; Tracy L. Penwell, wife, Defendants-Appellants.
Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino, a french trust, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Richard W. Morris; Morris Law Firm, PLLC, Appellants,
v.
Jean-Emmanuel Renoir, an individual; Beseder Inc., doing business as Rima Fine Art; Dror Darel, husband; Tracy L. Penwell, wife, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 07-15582, 07-15583, 07-17209.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 1, 2009.

Richard W. Morris, Esquire, Artemio Reategui, Esquire, Richard W. Stevens, *970 Morris Law Firm, PLLC, Surprise, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael R. Hambly, Esquire, David Paul Steiner, Esquire, David Steiner & Associats, Los Angeles, CA, Ray K. Harris, Esquire, Fennemore Craig PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Phil Scot Flemming, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, Joshua J. Kaufman, Esquire, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

Judge Schroeder and Judge Reinhardt voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed. R.App. P. 35.)

The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino v. Renoir
561 F.3d 969 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 F.3d 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/societe-civile-succession-guino-v-renoir-ca9-2009.