Sobolewski v. Forte

Connecticut Superior Court

Sobolewski v. Forte

7 Conn. Super. Ct. 124

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 17, 1939

DocketFile No. 50129

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 124 (Sobolewski v. Forte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sobolewski v. Forte, 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 124 (Colo. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

The consensus of opinion of the spectators is that fire water played at least a minor part in this barroom fracas. The issue as to whether the plaintiff or defendant started the rumpus is still beclouded. It is clear, however, that the defendant used much more force than circumstances required. The two physicians who treated the plaintiff's wounds are quite sure that a blunt instrument was used. The conduct of the defendant after the battle favors this conclusion.

Judgment is for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant, thomas Forte, $1,869.60 and his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The consensus of opinion of the spectators is that fire water played at least a minor part in this barroom fracas. The issue as to whether the plaintiff or defendant started the rumpus is still beclouded. It is clear, however, that the defendant used much more force than circumstances required. The two physicians who treated the plaintiff's wounds are quite sure that a blunt instrument was used. The conduct of the defendant after the battle favors this conclusion.

Judgment is for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant, thomas Forte, $1,869.60 and his costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Conn. Super. Ct. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobolewski-v-forte-connsuperct-1939.