Sobol v. Sobol
This text of 669 So. 2d 350 (Sobol v. Sobol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the awards of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees because the trial court did not make sufficient findings of fact to afford appropriate appellate review. See Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Moreno v. Moreno, 606 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Miller v. Miller, 589 So.2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court also failed to make the findings required in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), to support the attorney’s fees award. We direct the trial court on remand to reconsider these awards and to make the requisite findings of fact.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 So. 2d 350, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2345, 1996 WL 106565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobol-v-sobol-fladistctapp-1996.