Sobol v. Sobol

669 So. 2d 350, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2345, 1996 WL 106565
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1996
DocketNo. 95-0422
StatusPublished

This text of 669 So. 2d 350 (Sobol v. Sobol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sobol v. Sobol, 669 So. 2d 350, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2345, 1996 WL 106565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the awards of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees because the trial court did not make sufficient findings of fact to afford appropriate appellate review. See Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Moreno v. Moreno, 606 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Miller v. Miller, 589 So.2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court also failed to make the findings required in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), to support the attorney’s fees award. We direct the trial court on remand to reconsider these awards and to make the requisite findings of fact.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moreno v. Moreno
606 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hemraj v. Hemraj
620 So. 2d 1300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Miller v. Miller
589 So. 2d 317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
472 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 So. 2d 350, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2345, 1996 WL 106565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobol-v-sobol-fladistctapp-1996.