Sobol v. Sobol
191 So. 2d 68
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1966·No. No. 66-67·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Morrison v. Morrison, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 199, 201, wherein the court states: “It is settled principle of law in this state that a court of equity possesses no power to go back and grant a new right, or impose a new duty not adjudicated in its former decree after it has become final and absolute.” See also McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 894.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sobol v. Sobol, 191 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
191 So. 2d 68 (Sobol v. Sobol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Comcowich v. Comcowich
237 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Pagro, Inc.
223 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Walden v. State
191 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)