Sobol v. Sobol
191 So. 2d 68
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 1966
DocketNo. 66-67
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 191 So. 2d 68 (Sobol v. Sobol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sobol v. Sobol, 191 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Morrison v. Morrison, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 199, 201, wherein the court states: “It is settled principle of law in this state that a court of equity possesses no power to go back and grant a new right, or impose a new duty not adjudicated in its former decree after it has become final and absolute.” See also McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 894.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Comcowich v. Comcowich
237 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Pagro, Inc.
223 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Walden v. State
191 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
191 So. 2d 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobol-v-sobol-fladistctapp-1966.