Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sobol v. K Mart Corp.

Sobol v. K Mart Corp.

275 A.D.2d 974, 715 N.Y.S.2d 193, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9503
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 974 (Sobol v. K Mart Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sobol v. K Mart Corp., 275 A.D.2d 974, 715 N.Y.S.2d 193, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Defendants failed to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff was injured in the course of performing routine maintenance rather than repairing the sign (see, Smith v Shell Oil Co., 85 NY2d 1000, 1002; Izrailev v Ficarra Furniture, 70 NY2d 813, 815). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, O’Donnell, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Shell Oil Co.
654 N.E.2d 1210 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Izrailev v. Ficarra Furniture of Long Island, Inc.
517 N.E.2d 1318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 974, 715 N.Y.S.2d 193, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobol-v-k-mart-corp-nyappdiv-2000.