Sobol v. Chelsea Hotel Corporation
This text of 61 A.2d 503 (Sobol v. Chelsea Hotel Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the former Supreme Court at the Atlantic County Circuit, opening e,n *14 interlocutory judgment entered against the defendant by default, and permitting it to appear and defend upon terms.
An appeal, however, lies only from a final judgment. The order thus sought to be reviewed does not fall within the category of a final judgment and is, therefore, not appealable. R. S. 2:27-349. Vide Farmland Dairies v. Van Tol, 132 N. J. L. 298, aff’d 133 Id. 313; Matthews v. Public Servive Interstate, etc., Co., 130 Id. 495; Chavers v. McCall, 127 Id. 595; Kople v. Zalon, 122 Id. 422; Jacquin v. Appelgate, 128 Id. 598; Gaffney v. Illiwgsworth, 90 Id. 490.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed, with costs.
For dismissal of appeal: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—7,
Opposed: None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.2d 503, 1 N.J. 13, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobol-v-chelsea-hotel-corporation-nj-1948.