Sobers v. Roth Bros. Partnership Co.

284 A.D.2d 324, 725 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612

This text of 284 A.D.2d 324 (Sobers v. Roth Bros. Partnership Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sobers v. Roth Bros. Partnership Co., 284 A.D.2d 324, 725 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated May 17, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A landowner has a duty to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition and to take precautionary measures to protect tenants from the reasonably foreseeable criminal acts of third persons (see, Miller v State of New York, 62 NY2d 506; Siino v Reices, 216 AD2d 552; Johnson v Slocum Realty Corp., 191 AD2d 613). A landlord is under no duty to safeguard a tenant against an attack by another tenant or his invitee if the landlord did not have the authority to control the assailant (see, Adelstein v Waterview Towers, 250 AD2d 790; Perry v Northwestern Realty Co., 236 AD2d 378; Siino v Reices, supra). Here, the defendants established that they owed no duty to the plaintiffs since the assailant was an invitee of the resident superintendent (see, Provenzano v Roslyn Gardens Tenants Corp., 190 AD2d 718).

Moreover, the plaintiffs’ opposition papers failed to raise an issue of fact that even if the assailant could be considered an intruder, the criminal conduct was reasonably predictable based upon prior occurrences of similar criminal activity at the premises (see, Novikova v Greenbriar Owners Corp., 258 AD2d 149; Ospina v City of New York, 214 AD2d 551). S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. State of New York
467 N.E.2d 493 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Provenzano v. Roslyn Gardens Tenants Corp.
190 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Johnson v. Slocum Realty Corp.
191 A.D.2d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Ospina v. City of New York
214 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Siino v. Reices
216 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Perry v. Northwestern Realty Co.
236 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Adelstein v. Waterview Towers, Inc.
250 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
258 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D.2d 324, 725 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobers-v-roth-bros-partnership-co-nyappdiv-2001.