Sobel v. Sternberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sobel v. Sternberg

259 A.D. 781, 19 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6618

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 1940·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Cunningham and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the “ Sixth,” “ Seventh,” [782]*782“ Eighth,” and “ Tenth ” findings of fact are against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for the declaration of a constructive trust in favor of plaintiff of certain property standing in the name of defendant,) Present — Crosby, P. J„ Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Cunningham and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the “ Sixth,” “ Seventh,” [782]*782“ Eighth,” and “ Tenth ” findings of fact are against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for the declaration of a constructive trust in favor of plaintiff of certain property standing in the name of defendant,) Present — Crosby, P. J„ Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Sobel v. Sternberg, 259 A.D. 781, 19 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 781 (Sobel v. Sternberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.