Sobel v. Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sobel v. Rand

260 A.D. 869, 23 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5143

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1940·Published

Opinion

In a derivative, representative stockholders’ action, order granting stay modified by adding to the first ordering paragraph after the words “ are not discontinued ” the words “ or otherwise finally disposed of; ” by adding after the words “ the moving defendants stipulate to ” the words “ consent to; ” and by adding at the end of said paragraph the words “ without prejudice to an application by plaintiff for leave to intervene in the Leech or Mintzer action.” As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a derivative, representative stockholders’ action, order granting stay modified by adding to the first ordering paragraph after the words “ are not discontinued ” the words “ or otherwise finally disposed of; ” by adding after the words “ the moving defendants stipulate to ” the words “ consent to; ” and by adding at the end of said paragraph the words “ without prejudice to an application by plaintiff for leave to intervene in the Leech or Mintzer action.” As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Sobel v. Rand, 260 A.D. 869, 23 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 869 (Sobel v. Rand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.