Sobczynski v. Chiari

258 A.D.2d 565, 682 N.Y.S.2d 898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sobczynski v. Chiari. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D.2d 565

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated November 26, 1997, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR former 306-b (a).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, they appeared in the [566]*566action by executing the stipulation which extended their time to answer and waived the affirmative defense of personal service (see, Parrotta v Wolgin, 245 AD2d 872; Cohen v Ryan, 34 AD2d 789; Kimmel v State of New York, 172 Misc 2d 906). This appearance, made within 120 days after the commencement of the action, was sufficient to avoid automatic dismissal pursuant to CPLR former 306-b (a) (see, Parrotta v Wolgin, supra; Kimmel v State of New York, supra). Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not err in vacating the dismissal of the action. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sobczynski v. Chiari, 258 A.D.2d 565, 682 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

258 A.D.2d 565 (Sobczynski v. Chiari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Ryan
34 A.D.2d 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Parrotta v. Wolgin
245 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Kimmel v. State
172 Misc. 2d 906 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)