Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Soares v. Blesedell

Soares v. Blesedell

185 So. 3d 1258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 2016 WL 671979
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 2016
DocketNo. 5D15-1183
StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 3d 1258 (Soares v. Blesedell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soares v. Blesedell, 185 So. 3d 1258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 2016 WL 671979 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) (holding that without transcript of trial court proceedings, appellate court cannot review sufficiency of evidence).

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 3d 1258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 2016 WL 671979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soares-v-blesedell-fladistctapp-2016.