Snyder v. United States

112 U.S. 216, 5 S. Ct. 118, 28 L. Ed. 697, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1872
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 17, 1884
Docket70
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 112 U.S. 216 (Snyder v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snyder v. United States, 112 U.S. 216, 5 S. Ct. 118, 28 L. Ed. 697, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1872 (1884).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gray

delivered the opinion of the court. He stated the facts in the foregoing language, and continued:

Informations under the revenue laivs for the forfeiture of goods, seeking no judgment of fine or imprisonment against *217 any person, are not strictly criminal cases, in which the decisions of the Circuit Court are final, unless a division of opinion is certified ; but they are civil actions, of which this court has jurisdiction in error, without regatd to the sum or value in dispute. Rev. Stat. § 699; Pettigrew v. United States, 97 U. S. 385. Yet, as has been expressly adjudged, they are so far in the nature of criminal proceedings, as to come within the rule that a general verdict, upon several counts seeking in different forms one object, must be upheld if one count is good. Clifton v. United States, 4 How. 242, 250. As one of the counts in this case is admitted to 'be good, it is unnecessary to consider the objections taken to the other counts.

The verdict, though expressed in bad English, clearly manifested the intention and finding of the jury upon the issue submitted to them, and the court rightly gave judgment upon it. Rev. Stat. § 954; Parks v. Turner, 12 How. 39, 46 ; Lincoln v. Iron Co., 103 U. S. 412.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Walters
57 M.J. 554 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2002)
Griffin v. United States
502 U.S. 46 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Street v. New York
394 U.S. 576 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Felix Williams v. United States
260 F.2d 125 (Eighth Circuit, 1958)
United States v. Keith
1 C.M.A. 442 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1952)
United States v. Haupt
152 F.2d 771 (Seventh Circuit, 1945)
Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.
141 F.2d 41 (Third Circuit, 1944)
Crane v. People
11 P.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1932)
Perlowitz v. United States
282 F. 229 (Eighth Circuit, 1922)
Hays v. Hogan
200 S.W. 286 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1917)
Charles v. United States
213 F. 717 (Fourth Circuit, 1914)
Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Co.
33 App. D.C. 516 (D.C. Circuit, 1909)
Johns v. State
46 Fla. 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Dimmick v. United States
116 F. 825 (Ninth Circuit, 1902)
Long v. State
42 Fla. 612 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1900)
Wilson v. Territory of Arizona
60 P. 697 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1900)
Gurley v. O'Dwyer
61 Mo. App. 348 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Provo Manufacturing Co. v. Severance
51 Mo. App. 260 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Claassen v. United States
142 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 U.S. 216, 5 S. Ct. 118, 28 L. Ed. 697, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-united-states-scotus-1884.