Snyder v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snyder v. State

392 S.W.3d 575, 2013 WL 968107, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 317

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2013·No. No. WD 74761·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joseph J. Snyder appeals, after an evi-dentiary hearing, the trial court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Snyder argues that the trial court clearly erred in denying his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel which he bases on trial counsel’s failure to allow him to testify at the suppression hearing concerning the circumstances surrounding his confession. Finding no error of law, we affirm. A memorandum explaining more fully our opinion has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joseph J. Snyder appeals, after an evi-dentiary hearing, the trial court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Snyder argues that the trial court clearly erred in denying his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel which he bases on trial counsel’s failure to allow him to testify at the suppression hearing concerning the circumstances surrounding his confession. Finding no error of law, we affirm. A memorandum explaining more fully our opinion has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Snyder v. State, 392 S.W.3d 575, 2013 WL 968107, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

392 S.W.3d 575 (Snyder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.