Snyder v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snyder v. State

262 S.W.3d 675, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 2008 WL 4133831

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 9, 2008

DocketED 90276

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 S.W.3d 675 (Snyder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. State, 262 S.W.3d 675, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 2008 WL 4133831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Neal Snyder appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s judgment was based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Neal Snyder appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s judgment was based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.W.3d 675, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 2008 WL 4133831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack