Snyder v. State

262 S.W.3d 675, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 2008 WL 4133831
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 2008·No. ED 90276·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Neal Snyder appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s judgment was based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snyder v. State, 262 S.W.3d 675, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 2008 WL 4133831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

262 S.W.3d 675 (Snyder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snyder v. State
288 S.W.3d 301 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
Specialty Medical Sales, Inc. v. Scott Lee Heating Co.
262 S.W.3d 675 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)