Snyder v. South Suburban Sanitary District

Oregon Supreme Court

Snyder v. South Suburban Sanitary District

446 P.2d 514, 251 Or. 520, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 487

DecidedNovember 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 446 P.2d 514 (Snyder v. South Suburban Sanitary District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. South Suburban Sanitary District, 446 P.2d 514, 251 Or. 520, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 487 (Or. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

O’CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The jury awarded plaintiff damages against defendant Ron Phair only and he appeals.

[521]*521Defendant contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

We concur in the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiff was not contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The jury awarded plaintiff damages against defendant Ron Phair only and he appeals.

[521]*521Defendant contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

We concur in the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiff was not contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 P.2d 514, 251 Or. 520, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-south-suburban-sanitary-district-or-1968.