Snyder v. Plummer
162 P. 1040, 174 Cal. 204, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 773
Opinion
In denying the petition for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, we deem it proper to say that the denial is made solely for the reason that the order of the superior court sought to be reviewed is a special order made after final judgment, and is therefore one from which an appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963.) This being so, certiorari will not lie. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.) *Page 205
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snyder v. Plummer, 162 P. 1040, 174 Cal. 204, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 773 (Cal. 1917).
162 P. 1040 (Snyder v. Plummer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lovret v. Seyfarth
22 Cal. App. 3d 841 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)
Coley v. Superior Court
264 P. 1110 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
McKeever v. Superior Court
259 P. 373 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)