Snyder v. Plummer

California Supreme Court

Snyder v. Plummer

174 Cal. 204

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1917

DocketSac. No. 2630

StatusPublished

This text of 174 Cal. 204 (Snyder v. Plummer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. Plummer, 174 Cal. 204 (Cal. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

In denying the petition for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, we deem it proper to say that the denial is made solely for the reason that the order of the superior court sought to be reviewed is a special order made after final judgment, and is therefore one from which an appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proe., sec. 963.) This being so, certiorari will not lie. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

In denying the petition for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, we deem it proper to say that the denial is made solely for the reason that the order of the superior court sought to be reviewed is a special order made after final judgment, and is therefore one from which an appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proe., sec. 963.) This being so, certiorari will not lie. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 Cal. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-plummer-cal-1917.