Snyder v. Plummer

California Supreme Court

Snyder v. Plummer

174 Cal. 118

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1916

DocketSac. No. 2616

StatusPublished

This text of 174 Cal. 118 (Snyder v. Plummer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. Plummer, 174 Cal. 118 (Cal. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

In denying a rehearing it is proper to state

that the petition for a writ of review was denied because it showed on its face a prior application to the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, and a denial by that court. This barred a new application for such a writ to this court, the only remedy of petitioner being a petition for hearing in this court of the district court of appeal proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

In denying a rehearing it is proper to state

that the petition for a writ of review was denied because it showed on its face a prior application to the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, and a denial by that court. This barred a new application for such a writ to this court, the only remedy of petitioner being a petition for hearing in this court of the district court of appeal proceeding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 Cal. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-plummer-cal-1916.