Snyder v. Pabst Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Snyder v. Pabst Brewing Co.

1896 OK 38, 43 P. 1063, 4 Okla. 259, 1896 Okla. LEXIS 39

DecidedFebruary 13, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 1896 OK 38 (Snyder v. Pabst Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. Pabst Brewing Co., 1896 OK 38, 43 P. 1063, 4 Okla. 259, 1896 Okla. LEXIS 39 (Okla. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam:

The Pabst Brewing Co., commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county, against H. Lamar, N. R. Snyder and Q-. W. Spencer, to recover judgment upon a contract previously entered into between the parties June 13, 1892.. The Pabst Brewing Co., obtained a judgment against defendants Snyder and Spencer by default. February 15, 1893, Snyder filed in the district court a complaint for review and on March 20, 1893, The Pabst Brewing Co. filed demurrer to such complaint, which demurrer was by the trial court sustained.

To reverse the ruling of the trial court upon the demurrer Snyder brings up the case. The petition in error was filed in this court February 20, 1895. No briefs have been filed by appellant. After an examination of the record we find no apparent error and we therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam:

The Pabst Brewing Co., commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county, against H. Lamar, N. R. Snyder and Q-. W. Spencer, to recover judgment upon a contract previously entered into between the parties June 13, 1892.. The Pabst Brewing Co., obtained a judgment against defendants Snyder and Spencer by default. February 15, 1893, Snyder filed in the district court a complaint for review and on March 20, 1893, The Pabst Brewing Co. filed demurrer to such complaint, which demurrer was by the trial court sustained.

To reverse the ruling of the trial court upon the demurrer Snyder brings up the case. The petition in error was filed in this court February 20, 1895. No briefs have been filed by appellant. After an examination of the record we find no apparent error and we therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1896 OK 38, 43 P. 1063, 4 Okla. 259, 1896 Okla. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-pabst-brewing-co-okla-1896.