Snyder v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Snyder v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

62 A. 418, 72 N.J.L. 262, 43 Vroom 262, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 110

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1905·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions raised in this ease are the same as those raised in Gardner & Meeks Company v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, decided by this court at the present term (ante ¶. 257). The judgment under review herein will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that case.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray. 13. For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The questions raised in this ease are the same as those raised in Gardner & Meeks Company v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, decided by this court at the present term (ante ¶. 257). The judgment under review herein will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that case.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray. 13. For reversal — -None.

Snyder v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 62 A. 418, 72 N.J.L. 262, 43 Vroom 262, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 110 (N.J. 1905).

Pincite

62 A. 418 (Snyder v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.