Snyder v. Martin
This text of 39 F. 722 (Snyder v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(orally.) This is a creditor’s bill by which the complainant seeks to recover the amount of a judgment rendered in favor of the firm of which the Complainant is the surviving partner against the firm of Lawrence & Martin on property, the title to which stands in the name of the defendant Carrie E. Martin, the wife of the defendant Morris T. Martin. It appears from the proof in the case that the defendant Carrie E. Martin holds the title to the real estate in question, and that all the said real estate was paid for with money earned in the business of the Phoenix Grain & Stock Exchange, a “bucket-shop” concern in this city, of which the defendant Morris T. Martin was the manager.
Mrs. Martin never invested any money in this corporation. She became a subscriber to one-half the capital stock of the company at the time it was formed. She borrowed, as the proof shows, from one of the stockholders the sum of $600, which was all the money that was ever put into the business, as far as the Martins were concerned. From the earnings of this business—the business which was conducted by Martin as its manager—the $600-note was paid and the real estate in question was bought and paid for, the title simply being taken in the name of Mrs. Martin. The defendant Morris T. Martin being in debt to the complainant at this time, I do not think he could secrete his earnings in the name of his wife to the delay or in fraud of his creditors. This is property that has not been earned or acquired by any effort or instrumentality of Mrs. Martin, nor is it the outcome of any investment by her; but it has been accumulated solely by the shrewd conduct and business ability of Morris Martin himself. There will be a decree in favor of the complainant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F. 722, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-martin-circtndil-1889.