Snyder v. Lapp
This text of 80 N.W. 806 (Snyder v. Lapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is a doctrine established by numerous decisions that the appellate jurisdiction of this .court depends upon the filing with the clerk of a duly authenticated transcript of the proceedings of the district court, containing the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed. See Moore v. Waterman, 40 Nebr., 498; McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Nebr., 406; Otis v. Butters, 46 Nebr., 492; Einspahr v. Exchange Nat. Bank, 49 Nebr., 557; Bailey v. Eastman, 54 Nebr., 416. In this case there is no certificate of any kind attached to the papers before us. We are, therefore, without authority to do anything except to enter an order dismissing the petition in -error. A judgment, should we assume to pronounce one, would be void. The petition in error is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 N.W. 806, 59 Neb. 243, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-lapp-neb-1899.