Snyder v. Jenkins

6 Wend. 533
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1831
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Wend. 533 (Snyder v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snyder v. Jenkins, 6 Wend. 533 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

Judgment is to be entered upon a report of referees in the same manner as upon the verdict of a jury. 2 R. S. 385, § 48. Upon the verdict of a jury, judgment cannot regularly be signed till four days after the filing of the postea, 3 Salk. 212, 215; 6 Mod. 241; and such was declared to be the practice in Bank of Orange v. Brown, 1 Wendell, 31. The same rule is laid down in Rose v. Rock, 6 Johns. R. 330, viz. that judgments after verdict are always judgments nisi, i. e. unless cause be shewn to the contrary in four days. The judgment in this case being signed, and record filed, before the expiration of four days after the filing of the . report, the proceedings were irregular.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Orange v. Brown
1 Wend. 31 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Wend. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-jenkins-nysupct-1831.