Snyder v. Hunter

D.C. Circuit

Snyder v. Hunter

11 F.2d 336, 56 App. D.C. 164, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2485

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 1926

DocketNo. 4327

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 F.2d 336 (Snyder v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. Hunter, 11 F.2d 336, 56 App. D.C. 164, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2485 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Motion by the United States to reeall the mandate heretofore issued, that it may be amended; the ground of the motion being that there exists a misapprehension as to its scope.

The habeas corpus petition was accompanied by a petition for certiorari to the commissioner. By stipulation the stenographic record of the hearing before the commissioner was made a part of his return to the writ of certiorari. By further stipulation the case came before the lower court on both the petition for habeas corpus and for warrants of removal. That hearing was upon the record made before the commissioner, no further evidence having been offered by either side. The lower court disagreed with the commissioner. We agreed with the commissioner and reversed the judgment. Obviously, all that remained to be done was the issuance of the removal warrants.

In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to reeall the mandate, as to which there Can be no further question. Wilson v. Newburgh, 43 App. D. C. 202. The motion is therefore denied.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Motion by the United States to reeall the mandate heretofore issued, that it may be amended; the ground of the motion being that there exists a misapprehension as to its scope.

The habeas corpus petition was accompanied by a petition for certiorari to the commissioner. By stipulation the stenographic record of the hearing before the commissioner was made a part of his return to the writ of certiorari. By further stipulation the case came before the lower court on both the petition for habeas corpus and for warrants of removal. That hearing was upon the record made before the commissioner, no further evidence having been offered by either side. The lower court disagreed with the commissioner. We agreed with the commissioner and reversed the judgment. Obviously, all that remained to be done was the issuance of the removal warrants.

In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to reeall the mandate, as to which there Can be no further question. Wilson v. Newburgh, 43 App. D. C. 202. The motion is therefore denied.

Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F.2d 336, 56 App. D.C. 164, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-hunter-cadc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack