Snyder v. Heath
185 N.C. 362
Opinion
after stating tbe case: For tbe reasons so clearly stated by bis Honor, Long, J., who beard tbe case below, we think tbe judgment [366] must be upheld. See Homes Co. v. Falls, 184 N. C., 426; Stevenson v. Spivey, 21 A. L. R. (Va.), 1276, and annotation, where the questions involved are exhaustively treated.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snyder v. Heath, 185 N.C. 362 (N.C. 1923).
185 N.C. 362 (Snyder v. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed v. Elmore
98 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Muilenburg v. Blevins
87 S.E.2d 493 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Maples v. Horton
80 S.E.2d 38 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
75 S.E.2d 620 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Phillips v. . Wearn
37 S.E.2d 895 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Turner v. . Glenn
18 S.E.2d 197 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Delaney v. . Hart
150 S.E. 702 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Thomas v. . Rogers
133 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)