Snyder v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8044

RICHARD SNYDER; CATHERINE SNYDER,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP; HARLEY LEWIN; STEPHEN J. WADYKA; JANET SHIH HAJEK; DIANE VON FURSTENBERG, LP,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

DIANE VON FURSTENBERG STUDIO; LARISSA MACFARQUHAR; THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC.; CONDE NAST, INCORPORATED; ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED, trading as The New Yorker,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01270-GBL-TCB)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Snyder, Catherine Snyder, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas Gerard Connolly, Jacinda Ann Lanum, Patrick Pearse O’Donnell, Christopher J. Wright, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kevin B. Bedell, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Richard and Catherine Snyder appeal the district

court’s orders dismissing their civil action and reconsideration

of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Snyder v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP,

No. 1:08-cv-01270-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2009 & Jan. 11,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED