Snyder v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
This text of 52 A. 384 (Snyder v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court, and the case in that court is reported ante p. 7, the [627]*627finding of the judge, who tried the cause without a jury, being there set out at length.
The judge, sitting as a jury, found as a fact that the broker who procured for the plaintiff the policy in suit had the authority of the plaintiff to do so, and had, with the knowledge of the plaintiff, replaced other insurance with this policy. These facts established the plaintiff’s right to recover, and the finding of questions of fact not being reviewable by the court on writ of error, the judgment below should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vroom. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 A. 384, 67 N.J.L. 626, 38 Vroom 626, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-commercial-union-assurance-co-nj-1902.