Snyder v. Baer

127 A. 773, 282 Pa. 291, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 616
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 7, 1925
DocketAppeal, 223
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 127 A. 773 (Snyder v. Baer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snyder v. Baer, 127 A. 773, 282 Pa. 291, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 616 (Pa. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the refusal to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. After reading the statement of claim, the affidavit, and the amendment thereto, we cannot say it is “clear and free from doubt” that the court below erred in the order complained of; and, following the usual course (Brown v. Unger, 269 Pa. 471, 472; Mancia v. Marquette N. Fire Ins., 280 Pa. 174, 176), we shall not discuss the facts or the applicable rules of law until called upon so to do after an opportunity is had to develop the former at trial. See Girsh v. Holland, 282 Pa. 327, decided contemporaneously herewith.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hershey Estates v. Rettew
19 Pa. D. & C. 262 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1933)
Leavitte v. Drive-It-Yourself Co.
86 Pa. Super. 548 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Girsh v. Rolland
127 A. 773 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 773, 282 Pa. 291, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-baer-pa-1925.