Snyder v. Baer

127 A. 773, 282 Pa. 291, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 616
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1925·No. Appeal, 223·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the refusal to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. After reading the statement of claim, the affidavit, and the amendment thereto, we cannot say it is “clear and free from doubt” that the court below erred in the order complained of; and, following the usual course (Brown v. Unger, 269 Pa. 471, 472; Mancia v. Marquette N. Fire Ins., 280 Pa. 174, 176), we shall not discuss the facts or the applicable rules of law until called upon so to do after an opportunity is had to develop the former at trial. See Girsh v. Holland, 282 Pa. 327, decided contemporaneously herewith.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snyder v. Baer, 127 A. 773, 282 Pa. 291, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 616 (Pa. 1925).

127 A. 773 (Snyder v. Baer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hershey Estates v. Rettew
19 Pa. D. & C. 262 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1933)
Leavitte v. Drive-It-Yourself Co.
86 Pa. Super. 548 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Girsh v. Rolland
127 A. 773 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)