Snyder-Hill v. OSU Office of Univ Compliance & Integrity

Ohio Court of Claims

Snyder-Hill v. OSU Office of Univ Compliance & Integrity

2020 Ohio 5280

CourtOhio Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 13, 2020

Docket2020-00308PQ

StatusPublished

This text of 2020 Ohio 5280 (Snyder-Hill v. OSU Office of Univ Compliance & Integrity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder-Hill v. OSU Office of Univ Compliance & Integrity, 2020 Ohio 5280 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as Snyder-Hill v. OSU Office of Univ Compliance & Integrity, 2020-Ohio-5280.]

STEPHEN MICHAEL SNYDER-HILL Case No. 2020-00308PQ

Requester Judge Patrick M. McGrath

v. JUDGMENT ENTRY

OSU OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY

Respondent

{¶1} On September 22, 2020, a special master issued a report and recommendation (R&R) in this public-records case. The special master recommends that the court find that (1) all claims for production of records were resolved during mediation, (2) respondent failed to provide requested records from Request No. 19- 0897 within a reasonable period of time, (3) requester is entitled to recover from respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by requester, and (4) court costs should be assessed to respondent. (R&R, 8-9.) {¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the R&R. Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, this court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” {¶3} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the R&R of September 22, 2020. The court therefore adopts the special master’s R&R, including the special master’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the R&R. Judgment is rendered in favor of requester. Requester is entitled to recover from respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that Case No. 2020-00308PQ -2- ENTRY

were incurred by requester, but requester is not entitled to recover attorney fees. Court costs are assessed against respondent. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK M. MCGRATH Judge Filed October 13, 2020 Sent to S.C. Reporter 11/13/20

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as Snyder-Hill v. OSU Office of Univ Compliance & Integrity, 2020-Ohio-5280.]

STEPHEN MICHAEL SNYDER-HILL Case No. 2020-00308PQ

Requester Judge Patrick M. McGrath

v. JUDGMENT ENTRY

OSU OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY

Respondent

{¶1} On September 22, 2020, a special master issued a report and recommendation (R&R) in this public-records case. The special master recommends that the court find that (1) all claims for production of records were resolved during mediation, (2) respondent failed to provide requested records from Request No. 19- 0897 within a reasonable period of time, (3) requester is entitled to recover from respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by requester, and (4) court costs should be assessed to respondent. (R&R, 8-9.) {¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the R&R. Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, this court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” {¶3} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the R&R of September 22, 2020. The court therefore adopts the special master’s R&R, including the special master’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the R&R. Judgment is rendered in favor of requester. Requester is entitled to recover from respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that Case No. 2020-00308PQ -2- ENTRY

were incurred by requester, but requester is not entitled to recover attorney fees. Court costs are assessed against respondent. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK M. MCGRATH Judge Filed October 13, 2020 Sent to S.C. Reporter 11/13/20

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2020 Ohio 5280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-hill-v-osu-office-of-univ-compliance-integrity-ohioctcl-2020.