Snyder County v. Wagenseller
This text of 66 Pa. Super. 345 (Snyder County v. Wagenseller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The appellant frankly concedes that the question involved in this case has been decided by this court against his contention, in Kittanning Borough v. Mast, 15 Pa. Superior Ct. 51, and has been followed in Allentown v. Hartman, 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 400; Lehigh Co. v. Gossler, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 406; Stroudsburg Boro. v. Shick, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 442; but urges that these cases were erroneously decided and should be overruled.
We have carefully gone over the arguments presented, and find nothing therein to change our views from those expressed in the cases cited, and which were adopted by the court below in the opinion filed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Pa. Super. 345, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-county-v-wagenseller-pasuperct-1917.