Snyder Air Products Co. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Snyder Air Products Co. v. State

33 A.D.2d 873, 307 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1969

DocketClaim No. 46285

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 873 (Snyder Air Products Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder Air Products Co. v. State, 33 A.D.2d 873, 307 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The trial court’s allowance of $85,000 for improvements is justi[874]*874fled by evidence of appraisals based on the economic approach to value but the trial court failed to make findings of the rental value of the building and of the factors upon which the building value could be properly based. There being sufficient evidence in the record from which appropriate findings may be made, however, we have re-evaluated the proof and make additional findings as follows: Annual gross income $15,400 less annual expenses for taxes $2,020; insurance $400; maintenance and janitor $580; management $450; and heat $1,800; leaving a net annual income of $10,150, of which $2,505 is imputable to land ($41,760 at 6%) and $7,645 is imputable to the building which capitalized at 9% (7% return plus 2% recapture) gives a building value of $85,000. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, in claim for damages for permanent appropriation.) Present — • Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The trial court’s allowance of $85,000 for improvements is justi[874]*874fled by evidence of appraisals based on the economic approach to value but the trial court failed to make findings of the rental value of the building and of the factors upon which the building value could be properly based. There being sufficient evidence in the record from which appropriate findings may be made, however, we have re-evaluated the proof and make additional findings as follows: Annual gross income $15,400 less annual expenses for taxes $2,020; insurance $400; maintenance and janitor $580; management $450; and heat $1,800; leaving a net annual income of $10,150, of which $2,505 is imputable to land ($41,760 at 6%) and $7,645 is imputable to the building which capitalized at 9% (7% return plus 2% recapture) gives a building value of $85,000. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, in claim for damages for permanent appropriation.) Present — • Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 873, 307 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-air-products-co-v-state-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack