Snuggs v. Snuggs
133 S.E.2d 174, 260 N.C. 533, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 756
Opinion
Plaintiff contends that Judge McConnell was without authority to- modify the order made by Judge Brock since defendant neither alleged nor offered evidence tending to show a change in condition (between the time Judge Brock -heard the matter and made hils order -and the time the matter was heard by Judge McConnell. The identical contention was made in Rock v. Rock, 260 N.C. 223. The conclusion then reached is determinative of this appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snuggs v. Snuggs, 133 S.E.2d 174, 260 N.C. 533, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 756 (N.C. 1963).
133 S.E.2d 174 (Snuggs v. Snuggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Robinson
179 S.E.2d 144 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)