Snuggs v. Snuggs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Snuggs v. Snuggs

133 S.E.2d 174, 260 N.C. 533, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 756

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 20, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 S.E.2d 174 (Snuggs v. Snuggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snuggs v. Snuggs, 133 S.E.2d 174, 260 N.C. 533, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 756 (N.C. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

Plaintiff contends that Judge McConnell was without authority to- modify the order made by Judge Brock since defendant neither alleged nor offered evidence tending to show a change in condition (between the time Judge Brock -heard the matter and made hils order -and the time the matter was heard by Judge McConnell. The identical contention was made in Rock v. Rock, 260 N.C. 223. The conclusion then reached is determinative of this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.

Plaintiff contends that Judge McConnell was without authority to- modify the order made by Judge Brock since defendant neither alleged nor offered evidence tending to show a change in condition (between the time Judge Brock -heard the matter and made hils order -and the time the matter was heard by Judge McConnell. The identical contention was made in Rock v. Rock, 260 N.C. 223. The conclusion then reached is determinative of this appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E.2d 174, 260 N.C. 533, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snuggs-v-snuggs-nc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack