SNR Roulements v. United States

2005 CIT 12
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in SNR Roulements v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 341 F. Supp. 2d 1334
United States Court of International Trade·Decided January 27, 2005·No. Consol. 01-00686·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 05-12

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: HONORABLE RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, SENIOR JUDGE

SNR ROULEMENTS, KOYO SEIKO CO., LTD., KOYO CORPORATION OF U.S.A., NSK CORPORATION, NSK BEARINGS EUROPE, LTD., NSK LTD., NTN-BCA CORPORATION, NTN BOWER CORPORATION, NTN- DRIVESHAFT, INC., AMERICAN NTN BEARING MANUFACTURING CORP., NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NTN CORPORATION, INA- SCHAEFFLER KG, INA USA CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, Consol. Court No. 01-00686 v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY,

Defendant- Intervenor.

JUDGMENT ORDER

Upon consideration of the United States Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Redetermination Results”) filed pursuant to the Court’s decision in SNR Roulements v. United States, Slip Op. 04-100 (Aug. 10, 2004), and all other papers filed herein, and no parties having filed comments regarding the Redetermination Results, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are sustained in all respects.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard W. Goldberg Richard W. Goldberg Senior Judge

Date: January 27, 2005 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SNR Roulements v. United States, 2005 CIT 12 (cit 2005).

2005 CIT 12 (SNR Roulements v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.