Snowell v. Moss

70 Ill. 313
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 Ill. 313 (Snowell v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snowell v. Moss, 70 Ill. 313 (Ill. 1873).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of forcible detainer, taken by appeal from a justice of the peace to the Superior Court of Cook county, and there tried by the court without a jury, and judgment of restitution.

It is objected, the court permitted an amendment of the complaint after the cause was submitted to the court, and before trial. The amendment made was not calculated to surprise the opposite party, but was in furtherance of justice, and properly allowed.

The real question in- the case is, did appellants promise, unconditionally, to pay rent for one year, to appellee, for these four or five feet of ground? This was a point strongly contested. The parties themselves were sworn, and there was conflict in their statements, which the court reconciled the best way possible, and we can not say improperly.

We can not disturb the finding, and affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

860 Lake Shore Drive Trust v. Gerber
153 N.E.2d 253 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1958)
Clow v. Gilbert
54 Ill. App. 134 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Ill. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snowell-v-moss-ill-1873.