Snowden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Snowden v. State

159 So. 3d 337, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3365, 2015 WL 1021410

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-4823

StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 3d 337 (Snowden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snowden v. State, 159 So. 3d 337, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3365, 2015 WL 1021410 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for trespass of an occupied structure or conveyance, a misdemeanor, for count one. See Washington v. State, 87 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) [338]*338(affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for trespass of an occupied structure or conveyance, a misdemeanor, for count one. See Washington v. State, 87 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) [338]*338(affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 3d 337, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3365, 2015 WL 1021410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snowden-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack