Snowden v. State

159 So. 3d 337, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3365, 2015 WL 1021410
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2015·No. No. 1D14-4823·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for trespass of an occupied structure or conveyance, a misdemeanor, for count one. See Washington v. State, 87 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) [338] (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ„ concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snowden v. State, 159 So. 3d 337, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3365, 2015 WL 1021410 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

159 So. 3d 337 (Snowden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Montgomery v. Montgomery
87 So. 3d 376 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)