Snowden v. Connor
100 Cal. App. 107
This text of 100 Cal. App. 107 (Snowden v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Snowden v. Connor, 100 Cal. App. 107 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).
Opinion
The notice of appeal was filed more than sixty days after entry of judgment, and more than thirty days after denial of the motion for a new trial. This was too late. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939; Schainman v. Kierce, 199 Cal. 249 [248 Pac. 905].)
The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schainman v. Kierce
248 P. 905 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 Cal. App. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snowden-v-connor-calctapp-1929.