Snow v. Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Snow v. Supervisors

6 P. 90, 2 Cal. Unrep. 445

California Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 1885·No. No. 9944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the COURT.

In this case the petitioner can bring his action for the writ of mandate in the superior court for the county above named. The reasons assigned for not bringing it in that court are insufficient, as there has been a change of the judge of that court since the judgment was rendered in the contésted election case of Reynolds v. Snow. In accordance with the rule of this court the petitioner must seek his remedy in the superior court.

Application denied, and proceedings dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

In this case the petitioner can bring his action for the writ of mandate in the superior court for the county above named. The reasons assigned for not bringing it in that court are insufficient, as there has been a change of the judge of that court since the judgment was rendered in the contésted election case of Reynolds v. Snow. In accordance with the rule of this court the petitioner must seek his remedy in the superior court.

Application denied, and proceedings dismissed.

Snow v. Supervisors, 6 P. 90, 2 Cal. Unrep. 445 (Cal. 1885).

Pincite

6 P. 90 (Snow v. Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related