Snow v. Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Snow v. Supervisors

6 P. 90, 2 Cal. Unrep. 445

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1885

DocketNo. 9944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 P. 90 (Snow v. Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snow v. Supervisors, 6 P. 90, 2 Cal. Unrep. 445 (Cal. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

In this case the petitioner can bring his action for the writ of mandate in the superior court for the county above named. The reasons assigned for not bringing it in that court are insufficient, as there has been a change of the judge of that court since the judgment was rendered in the contésted election case of Reynolds v. Snow. In accordance with the rule of this court the petitioner must seek his remedy in the superior court.

Application denied, and proceedings dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

In this case the petitioner can bring his action for the writ of mandate in the superior court for the county above named. The reasons assigned for not bringing it in that court are insufficient, as there has been a change of the judge of that court since the judgment was rendered in the contésted election case of Reynolds v. Snow. In accordance with the rule of this court the petitioner must seek his remedy in the superior court.

Application denied, and proceedings dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 P. 90, 2 Cal. Unrep. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-supervisors-cal-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack