Snow v. Sulkoski
This text of 186 N.E.2d 822 (Snow v. Sulkoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. Subject to the defendants’ exception the judge permitted an eyewitness to testify that the vehicle of the defendant Malvina Sulkoski, while backing up eight to ten feet, was moving at a speed of ten to fifteen miles an hour. There was no error. It was for the judge to determine, as a preliminary matter, the capacity and opportunity of the witness to make the observation, and for the jury to weigh it if admitted. Davidson v. Beacon Hill Taxi Sen. Inc. 278 Mass. 540, 541-542. Logan v. Goward, 313 Mass. 48, 51. Giles v. Barbosa, 338 Mass. 793, and cases cited. The exception is frivolous. Double costs are to be paid by the defendants. G. L. c. 211, § 10.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 N.E.2d 822, 345 Mass. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-sulkoski-mass-1962.