Snow v. State

138 S.W.2d 552

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Snow v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Tex. Crim. 263 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1940·No. No. 20936·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of property over the value of $50; punishment assessed [553]*553is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of six years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of property over the value of $50; punishment assessed [553]*553is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of six years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Snow v. State, 138 S.W.2d 552 (Tex. 1940).

Pincite

138 S.W.2d 552 (Snow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.