Snow v. State

50 Ark. 557
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 15, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 Ark. 557 (Snow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snow v. State, 50 Ark. 557 (Ark. 1888).

Opinion

OPINION.

Cogeeill, C. J.

Permitting a minor to play pool in a “dram shop or saloon” is a misdemeanor by virtue of the act of February 21st, 1887.

There is nothing in the act, nor in the evil it was intended to prevent, to indicate that the words “dram shop” and “saloon” are used as synonymous in meaning. •Neither in accurate signification nor by common acceptation, are they identical in meaning. A dram shop or place where spirituous liquor is sold by the drink, is commonly called a saloon, but the latter word has a much broader meaning. To constitute a saloon, it is not necessary that ardent spirits should be offered for sale, or that it should be a business requiring a license under the revenue laws of the state. Kitson v. Mayor of Ann Arbor, 26 Mich., 325; Goozen v. Phillips, 49 Ib., 7; State v. Mansker, 36 Tex., 364.

A place where cider, birch beer, ginger ale and like-refreshments are served after the manner of dram shops,, as the proof shows was done in this case, is. a saloon within the letter and spirit of the prohibition of this-statute. The influence of the company which is supposed to frequent such resorts, upon the morals of youths, is what the legislature sought to avert by this act, and the language used embraces the saloon in-the prohibitory as well as the licensed liquor districts.

The court’s charge was not unfavorable to the appellant, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grace v. Croninger
55 P.2d 940 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Downes v. McClellan
210 P. 397 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1922)
O'Byrne v. Henley
50 So. 83 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Cardillo v. People
26 Colo. 355 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Ark. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-state-ark-1888.