Home/Supreme Judicial Court of Maine/Snow v. Russell

Snow v. Russell

47 A. 536, 94 Me. 322, 1900 Me. LEXIS 64
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 10, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 A. 536 (Snow v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snow v. Russell, 47 A. 536, 94 Me. 322, 1900 Me. LEXIS 64 (Me. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment excluded was res inter alios. The doctrine of “lis pendens,” if otherwise applicable, is made inapplicable by the statute of this State. ' The ruling below was therefore not erroneous and the decision is,

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stokely v. Connor
85 So. 678 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A. 536, 94 Me. 322, 1900 Me. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-russell-me-1900.