Snow v. Russell

47 A. 536, 94 Me. 322, 1900 Me. LEXIS 64
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided September 10, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment excluded was res inter alios. The doctrine of “lis pendens,” if otherwise applicable, is made inapplicable by the statute of this State. ' The ruling below was therefore not erroneous and the decision is,

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snow v. Russell, 47 A. 536, 94 Me. 322, 1900 Me. LEXIS 64 (Me. 1900).

47 A. 536 (Snow v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokely v. Connor
85 So. 678 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)