Snow v. . Loman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Snow v. . Loman

150 S.E. 927, 197 N.C. 794, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 387

DecidedNovember 6, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E. 927 (Snow v. . Loman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snow v. . Loman, 150 S.E. 927, 197 N.C. 794, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 387 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The principal question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the issue of fraud. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the evidence in this regard, while slight, was such as to require its submission to the jury. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the testimony of the witnesses in detail, as the chief question presented is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The principal question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the issue of fraud. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the evidence in this regard, while slight, was such as to require its submission to the jury. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the testimony of the witnesses in detail, as the chief question presented is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 927, 197 N.C. 794, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-loman-nc-1929.